I don't know whether I should be insulted or flattered.
Honestly, much of what I say is tongue-in-cheek, but what bothers me is when someone "tinkles" over someone else's car, no matter the manufacturer.
P13 above states something to the effect that you can be frugal and buy the Kirkham for the "best bang for the buck" or you can buy a CSX for the "best resale value."
You can insert whatever manufacturer into the equation you want, FFR, SPF, BDR, KMP, CSX, ERA, etc., but there's no definitive evidence that proves any one manufacturer produces a greater ROI. As an example, I bet Levy Racing makes a profit on every FFR they build. While this is a business and they have to make a profit to stay in business, I think resale value is determined upon the quality of the build. The high quality cars, no matter the manufacturer, will garner the greater ROI.