View Single Post
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2010, 04:10 PM
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock RodKnock is offline
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,591
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by computerworks View Post
...of course it does. It certainly wasn't made in 1965... it replicates the car that was made back then.
I agree with that statement, BTW, Ron is a SAAC board member.

But that's not my point. Evan, you use absolute terms where there are no absolutes. You hang you hat on the SAAC definition, I don't.

I've been a member of SAAC, continuous and uninterupted, I'm fairly sure, since 1979. I feel I'm reasonably Shelby knowledgeable, I own a registry, no expert by any stretch, I attend auctions, I'm one of those buyers and sellers you speak of as the "general public", and I disagree with you.

I think Mr. Comer is spot on and while I'm sure it will never happen, I bet if you poll the SAAC membership, they would say any Cobra not made in the 1960's (CSX2000's and CSX3000's) is a replica. Pure conjecture, but that's a wager I would take.

There are many factors and forces as to why continuation CSX's and Kirkhams are listed in the SAAC Registry and the definition is the definition.

My objection here is your use of absolutes when there is none, at least to me. SAAC has an expert opinion and they wrote a book, the SAAC Registry, while others like Mr. Comer, have their expert opinions and they write books too.

You can find expert opinions on both sides of an issue, but as an attorney, you already know that.