Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
As for the claims on the body shape, that would be very easy to prove if you did in fact digitize the source body. So?  |
You can still digitize a car and
then make changes to fit your application. The great thing about today's modeling software is that it allows the user to tweek and not lose critical proportions. In other words, and as an example, If FFR needed to length the vertical space between the bottom of the door to the bottom of the sill to fit their frame mounting points, they could enlarge the entire area from the top of the door to the bottom of the sill and forward to the front wheel arch so they keep the relative shape and perspective and the changes become less notable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
Standard IRS (what a car of this nature needs) would be a far greater feat.
|
You really believe that? You really believe that what they've been able to accomplished is far less of a feat than making IRS standard rather than optional? Nonsense. The same could be said about struts vs. A arms. Regardless, I believe the FFR Spec series still require solid axle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
You mean the same guys that stay clear when customers need assistance, guidance, or have issues to solve with their product? The beauty of this forum over the other one is it does not belong to any one manufacturer and is open for discussion with a lot less slant.
|
The additional beauty of this forum is that you can quickly distinguish between those who have first hand experience and those that may be biased for one reason or another.
I guess the Fall Foliage Cruise won't be including FFRs any longer.
