Not Ranked
I can't speak for anyone else as far as comparing to FFR's but my reasoning is because I researched the cars when I was going to build a car and the FFR suited ME best. I'm a die hard Ford guy and always will be, owned and built several Mustangs and am extremely comfortable with all of the components that would have been used in my FFR build. I feel like I'm somewhat familiar with their car and even though I decided to build a '69 Mach instead of the FFR I still have kept up with their updates to the car throughout the years. That is why I asked for the comparison, sure I would love an ERA, Kirkham or even a Superformance but they didn't fit my budget plus I'm just going to beat the hell out of it anyway and again the FFR was better for ME.
As for the VIN, should it start with EM similar to what some of the other manufacturers do? I'm learning alot here about the E-M's, honestly I don't know if I gave them a fair shake prior to this(due to what was probably a sloppy and cheap build that I was able to see first hand). Can you point me to a site that has chassis pics of the mid nineties era E-M's??
|