View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 12:52 PM
roadrod2000's Avatar
roadrod2000 roadrod2000 is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Auburn, ca
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique 289 FIA HiPo 289 with Shelby dual quad intake
Posts: 187
Not Ranked     
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron61 View Post
Roadrod2000,

They have did away with the part of SB-100 that allows you to use the year of the engine to register by. It is now only the year the vehicle most closely resembles. That I got from our DMVs and the two Smog Referees in this area. And AB-1578 was added to cover just this type of thing.

SB-1578 Legislative Counsel's Digest: Third chapter:

This bill would eliminate the requirement that the registration provided to the first 500 vehicles by the DMV be an INITIAL REGISTRATION, for that vehicle, and would specify that the 500 vehicle limit does not apply to the renewal of registration of a vehicle previously registered pursuant to those provisions.

This bill was added to cover cars bought out of state as California won't recognize or accept other states registrations on these vehicles. The amnesty bill was mostly for people that had registered cars here before SB-100 was law to be able to come in and apply for one of the SB-100 numbers without being penalized. It uses the same 500 numbers as SB-100 does but is for previously registered cars from other states and not newly built ones like SB-100 is for. It requires some different forms, but basically works the same way as what the state wants to know is the cost of the car and how much they can tax it.

Ron
Not suprised that more and different information is out there. I pulled what I posted off the DMV website so some of it could be out of date.
One thing I do find interesting is that if the goal is to value the cars higher for tax reasons then why not just revalue all of the cars registered as 65 Cobras at the value of an original 65 Cobra? That would be sure to get everyones attention.
Reply With Quote