View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 11:12 PM
tin-man's Avatar
tin-man tin-man is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sun City West,, AZ
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF2984 MK111, Roush 511 IR FE 8 Stack, Dynoed: [flywheel] 572HP at 6000 , 556# Torque at 4700, Bowler 4R70W Auto Transmision. Tires: Mickey T's S/R 26.0x10.0x15.0 F ,26.0x12.0x15.0 R Color, Bleck, because they told me it was Bleck, at the factory.
Posts: 1,480
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnsnake View Post
Interesting question, but not a simple one.
In the example, we were at the limits of adhesion and assuming somewhat neutral handling. Using the same parameters, with additional rearward weight bias from your "ballast" you would rotate off the road even faster due to a greater pendulum effect.
However:
Adding ballast to the rear would change the overall handling characteristics of the car. If you added enough grip to the rear (relative to the front) it might just try to understeer straight off the road long before you neared the limits of adhesion of the rear. Lifting off the throttle or braking in an attempt to arrest the understeer might result in snap-oversteer and again, backing off the road.

Weight (MASS, actually) is ALWAYS the enemy when trying to accelerate, stop, or turn. Increasing rear grip by increasing the coefficient of friction (big, sticky tires) is better than by increasing the force normal to the plane (ballast).
Jim, so does this mean big sticky tires plus added weight in the trunk would help improve the traction thus decreasing the likelyhood of TTO?

John, AKA, tin-man
__________________
Be well, drive fast, live long
Reply With Quote