View Single Post
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:04 AM
LoBelly's Avatar
LoBelly LoBelly is offline
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: RMC, carb 347 TopLoader and Jag running gear ~ so old school I time it with an hour-glass :D
Posts: 1,293
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suthol View Post
Just had an email from the RTA stating that the inspection guys won't accept engineers calcs or FEA to demonstrate seat mount and seatbelt anchor points are ADR compliant, this was after I forwarded an email to them from their higher authority that stated cals or alternative methods such as a fully tested sacrificial chassis provided empirical evidence of compliance.

...


Depending on the legislation that empowers the RTA the decisions made by them can be reviewed by the Administrative Descisions Tribunal (NSW)

Decisions made in administration of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 are reviewable

but the ROAD TRANSPORT (VEHICLE REGISTRATION) REGULATIONS 2000 are not listed (so maybe a specific enquiry)

Administrative Decisions Tribunal of NSW - Adminstrative Decisions Tribunal : Lawlink NSW

However, if your state govt is looking at the RTA then it might be a good time to remind the transport minister or your local member that oversight/review of these matters might be a good thing and provide an avenue for getting complaints off his desk...

who knows

LB
Reply With Quote