[just dreamin]

Well as allways we seem to have got onto another issue. The point of the article was to illustrate that there are options available to challenge rulings and descisions that we assume are cast in stone. This guy challenged the system because he thought it unfair or unreasonable. Its obvious the Admin Apeals Tribunal rejected his apeal so he took it to the next level. The Federal Court thought he had a case and made a few suggestions. Low and behold his car was suddenly allowed in. The moral of the story is, You can sit back and complain all you like and no matter what, not much will change. Or you can do something about it which would require some time, commitment and money.