[Flygirl]

Thank you! I've been offline for a while now, a new job and traveling, no excuses really just swamped with a long to-do list.

Time to build/wait for a turnkey ERA: I know what y'all mean about the months passing, and then...there's the car coming off the transporter! I'm going to be 50 next year and am really experiencing that acceleration of the passage of time which comes with age. To be honest, the year flew by, and it's only going to get quicker. I'm not in any rush, really, so waiting's not a big deal. And I appreciate the contact information and offers of assistance. Sometimes I'm not good at reaching out, that's something I need to improve upon.

A new ERA for me?: Actually yes, I'm very serious about the idea. I placed a $5,000 deposit last month, and have been added to the list. But I'm still considering other options, one in particular; we'll see how it goes. I will say that I've read and re-read the assembly manual, and find myself thinking, "I could do that!" Really interesting stuff.

SB-100: From what I understand, SB-100 is an option for this car. And Green Hornet proves that to be so. Logically, I'm not sure I see how it's any different from a Superformance. In that case, SPF builds the roller and another entity adds the driveline. In ERA's case, ERA builds the roller, another entity adds the driveline...in fact, a third entity paints the body. I've seen other ERAs, built by ERA (as opposed to by an individual) registered under SB-100, in fact, I nearly bought one. Everything I've learned indicates that it should be SB-100 compliant.

Engine choices: During layovers and such, I've been reading a lot about the original Cobras, reviewing many pictures, and one of my students gifted me the book, "Shelby Cobra, 50 Years" by Colin Comer, which I carry with me wherever I go. The gist of that book is that the 428 was seen by most customers at the time as not terribly desirable. So, although some cars came with that engine, it was often (but not always) swapped out for a side oiler. That said, I'm pushing the budget with this car as it is, and the 428CJ is my turnkey engine of choice. A good blend of price, period correctness, and lower end torque in an engine that'll be built to a mild configuration.

Green Hornet's Car: Thank you! It's a beaut and has the look I'm going for. I'm in the bay area regularly, and would love to take you up on your offer. At the moment I think I'd prefer the five speed, but that's the main difference, besides the color. I've also seen some pics of earlier street 427s ( in particular, comedian Mort Sahl's car that was stolen in San Francisco in '66, and never seen again) that has only the chrome overriders front and rear, with that air splitter up front in the grille opening. I think one of the most attractive aspects of the car is in the rear, how the body curves down and in below the trunk opening, and worry that perhaps the bumper hides that feature a bit too much for my taste.

The current hypothetical set up of a turnkey ERA 427 Cobra for Pinto Girl: Street version, Wimbledon white, no scoop, 428/five speed, vinyl seats, street gas cap (or the comp version if it's cheaper, especially if I go with the comp instrument panel, see below), Halibrand style knock offs, undercar exhaust with the pipes exiting downward in the rear and mostly out of sight (instead of straight back), chrome overriders front and rear (no bumper or grille hoop) and the splitter up front, 15" wood steering wheel with the Cobra center cap. It'd be equipped with the heavy duty puller fan so the twin pushers wouldn't be necessary. The only question is that I really prefer the comp instrument panel, would it be too much of a mistake to spec that instead of the street panel, but with a glove compartment? From an aesthetic point of view, this car wouldn't have the sunbursts, so perhaps the comp filler cap and comp instrument panel with a glove compartment would be elements blending comp and street styles...? Or is that just weird? Really don't know how I feel about this yet.