View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2011, 09:25 PM
Treeve Treeve is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orange, NSW
Cobra Make, Engine: Dax
Posts: 429
Not Ranked     
Default

G'day All,

The RMS (formerly known as the RTA) have issued information specifically regarding ICV registration in NSW. They have been very clear about the proposed method for obtaining registration, and it really is a simple process. Here it is as a summary:

1. A certifier makes a submission to RMS for approval to begin construction. There is a specific form known as the "ICV Submission" form, which must be completed
2. The certifier can track the progress of the submission from this point forwards
3. The RMS can approve construction and issue an RMS ICV reference number. They are also allowed to refuse issuing of this number, however it is unlikely to be rejected at this point.
4. When the vehicle is completed, the certifier creates an incomplete compliance certificate using the RMS ICV reference number, but does not use a VIN
5. The certifier (or the owner) can then submit the incomplete compliance certificate to apply for a VIN
6. The RMS assess the submission, and can either approve or reject the submission.
7. If rejected, the certifier and / or owner have to work to address any areas requiring further detail for the RMS
8. If accepted, a VIN is issued
9. Once a VIN is issued, the Certifier can then complete the Compliance Certificate using this new VIN
10. The owner can then apply for registration of their ICV

So, there are two areas where the RMS can say no, however the chances of them saying no to a submission to build from a first time builder is incredibly unlikely. I actually cannot think of any reason why they can justifiably say no at this point. The second point comes down to how thorough your certifier is, how well they have performed in audits and the quality of their report. To assist with a high quality report, a high quality build goes a long way.... This doesn't mean an expensive build, but it does mean a build where shortcuts have not been taken, and correct nuts, bolts, design etc has been used to best advantage.

I am currently working on (and hope to have ready for the start of January) a condensed version of what you would need for an ICV (even a scratch build). This would make NSW one of the easiest states to register in.

As a final note, NSW has considerable rules which affect us as builders, owners, and enthusiasts. Whilst we can sit and complain about how easy the other states have it, and how green the grass is on the other side of the fence, lets look at what we do have: A requirement for quality. The rulers are set as they are to make sure that what we put on the roads are of known quality, and that we have done an outstanding job to get them there. Standards for UK cars don't even include B&T tests or bump steer requirements. This alone should let us relax a bit and be proud that although the bar is set higher in NSW, we are also able to reach the level that is required of us.

From where I am sitting, the new scheme is a good thing, and will level the playing field across NSW and stop the goal posts from moving for a considerable length of time.

Cheers,

Treeve

Edit to add: I'm on the VSCCS signatories list for ICV's; I thought I should admit this straight up so you can evaluate my post with full disclosure

Last edited by Treeve; 12-23-2011 at 09:29 PM..
Reply With Quote