View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2012, 06:26 PM
itstock's Avatar
itstock itstock is offline
CC Member/Contributor
Visit my Photo Gallery
Gold Star Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 445
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpanten View Post
I believe you are correct on which one reads lower, but it was a dyno dynamics dyno, not a mustang or dyno jet.
I'm not sure how I missed that part, but based on certain variables, the dyno dynamics read extremely close to the mustang dyno. On a Dynojet, the guestimated number could be believable, but really, it's not worth even guessing.

Either way, I'd be more interested to see what some of your cars trap in the 1/4 with these dyno numbers.

Last edited by itstock; 06-24-2012 at 06:29 PM..
Reply With Quote