[Buzz]

Originally Posted by BAsque1

Buzz: so we submit the info to you, I will prepare the one pertaining to the West Coast Cobras.
Basque1(Lou)
PS
Let me know the format; Excell perhaps?

Hi Lou, I am willing to compile the info if necessary, but I would prefer to see a group of seasoned Cobra folks work together to ensure some standards of fairness, accuracy and reliability of the information. As for the format, let's hear from folks with expertise in that field on which is the best way to go, keeping in mind issues of compatibility with the forum, editability and accessibility to those seeking the info.

Originally Posted by crASH

One of the things that would be additionally useful to include, albeit difficult to compile,
is the various dimensions of the vehicles. Don't know if it is feasible to gather this data so this is just food for thought.
Pehaps a field in your spreadsheet could be included for future use as "Dimensions"
I just think of the vehicle dimenions that are available for comparison on Edmunds.com when I am shopping for my next
daily driver. The taller/larger drivers would find this useful.
i.e. legroom (length from front of seatback to pedals?), footbox (width/depth at pedals?), hiproom in factory seat, etc.
Just ideas.

An excellent suggestion! We would have to come up with a set of standardized measurement guidelines or templates and get owners to supply the numbers.

Originally Posted by lightNFast

Hi… My name is Fred Hornbuckle and I resent that the rating scale (in fine print) indicates my Corvette based replica with a “stretched fiberglass body” has a rating of only 1!!!
Thank you very much…..

lol! Good one, but I must emphasize the accuracy rating is strictly a measurement of how far the manufacturer chose to go (or not) in replicating original Cobra details and is NOT to be perceived as a rating of the quality or desirability of the car. One man's pro may be another man's con so the idea is to simply put the factual info up and let each person decide what matters to him and what doesn't.

Originally Posted by Dimis

As a forum we can't even agree on BB vs SB, or even 1 roll bar or 2.

PS: The guy is seemingly a genius with graphic designs, a magician with photoshop and no doubt other picture drawing & rendering programs yet admittedly lacks the skills to cut and paste in excel? WT...? I must be missing something?

We don't need to agree on anything here though. If it has three roll bars let's just state that and leave it up to individuals to decide whether that is a good or a bad thing for them.

I can muddle my way through most word processing programs, but there are others who have mastered them. I never attempted to and I'm happy to let better people do a better job than I could in that area.

Originally Posted by YerDugliness

I wonder how accurate the information will be since it will reflect the personal opinions of those users who provide the "data".

An excellent example will be the issue of accuracy...the sample spreadsheet says the body on the Unique is accurate, but that could be misleading...didn't we just have a thread comparing the ERA and the Unique, the rocker panel on the ERA seems to be more in line with the shape of the originals than the Unique, IIRC....to the uninformed (read: ME!!) that would be something I would not ever notice, but to some it would be a critical issue.

How about models that have been upgraded from time to time...

Another field I think would be helpful would be one indicating where the parts for the build can be sourced...donor build (ala FFR), complete kit (like Hurricane), etc...how much fabrication is necessary (that is a deal-breaker for ME)...internet links so potential buyers can find online support communities (FFROG, etc.)...those sorts of things. All that could be invaluable for someone attempting to conduct their due diligence.

Cheers!!!

Dugly

Firstly, don't get caught up in what I posted for Unique - it's just a hastily prepared suggestion for capturing the data. Next - We don't want this to be a promo for individuals to big up their preferred brand of replica, which is why we need a team of people that includes someone with established Cobra expertise willing to provide input, sort and compile factual data, good, bad and Dugly about each brand. the only field open to some subjectivity should be the wiki notes area where owners can post relevant material about their direct experiences with the only the car and/or the manufacturer in question.
BTW - the thread you refer to discussed 289FIA models from ERA and Unique - mine is a 427 model.

Originally Posted by WardL

I've started a spreadsheet with Shelby, SPF, Kirkham, ERA and others. If you send me the details of your manufacturer I will update the spreadsheet. Keep it to the facts. We all love the Cobra we own, everyone understands that. So try to keep it factual and not personal. You can send info or an updated spreadsheet to my email: WFridrich@Comcast.net.

I tried to upload the spreadsheet but it was too large after creating a Zip file. Maybe Brent can suggest a way to manage this or post the spreadsheet in some way.
Today 12:29 AM
WardL This is a great start. I approached Brent last month about a posting a spreadsheet of replica specs in a similar attempt to allow newbies to have a quick reference to what is available, but have not heard back. I think it would be great to have a spreadsheet with the details of each manufacturer in one handy place. I've already put together the SPF, ERA and Kirkham and set up similar details for 427, 289, GT40, engines and buyer tips. I'll investigate trying to upload a spreadsheet to Club Cobra.

Great WardL! sounds like we have a foundation to begin building on.

More suggestions please - what else can we do to ensure completeness, factuality and objectivity of the final document?