Thread: Vms 427
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2013, 01:51 PM
itstock's Avatar
itstock itstock is offline
CC Member/Contributor
Visit my Photo Gallery
Gold Star Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 445
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn View Post
We've battled with the idea of a rating system for the engine power here. The engines we have dynoed out have all been done with the front accessories (alternator, belt), proper waterpump, actual carb you get on the motor etc. and the numbers seem less impressive than other builders (600hp pump gas small blocks really?)... but then you take those other motors and put them on the same dyno with the parts they show up with and suddenly, well you get the picture.

X is a great motor, I love driving them. Our new R offering pushes it a little further. We owe these other guys for all the research over the years, but want to optimize it for everyone.
I guess I should disclose that the air filter made 20rwhp less, so 460ish rwhp with the air filter on. I will probably race without the air filter, but it isn't a huge difference. I think that your advertised numbers are very fair to the buyer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBowman View Post
That is impressive!!! 10% loss at the RW? Can't ask for better than that...

I live pretty lose to this place-been looking for a dyno shop for after the car is together maybe Ill check this place out.
Injection Connection said that it should be around 550 hp at the flywheel, and I believe Jay was "advertising" the engine as 530+. It went in to the shop making 15rwhp less than the final numbers (35rwhp less if you count the air filter). So assuming somewhere between 12 and 15% drivetrain loss through the TKO600, the numbers are pretty close.

There are a couple of good places around here, but I trusted them to not scratch up the car while it was in there. And they didn't keep the car for weeks.

Last edited by itstock; 04-20-2013 at 02:19 PM..
Reply With Quote