View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2014, 07:46 PM
PANAVIA's Avatar
PANAVIA PANAVIA is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Jose CA, CA
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF_R_/BRG/FRBoss302/327CI/FordEFI/Under_Car_Exh/
Posts: 2,523
Not Ranked     
Default

OK, so I didnt mean this to turn into a bash on CA post as that is not the purpose of this.

when Summit pointed this out to me that the state of California ( unsure of department, I thought they mentioned Cal EPA ) had demanded this stopping of sale of "non C.A.R.B. approved" crate engine packages to CA residents , my first thought was ; under who's authority was this enacted >?

--what citizens were involved in this decision >?
--what notification and proposal for remedy was given >?

Not to mention that its NOT legal that they do this , first its directly a violation of the 14th amendment for free trade between states.

Note ; -- for every SPCNS / kit car that California may have , there are 10,000 pre 1973 cars that would be in the possible pathway for receiving a crate engine to revive their 65 mustang, or 68 corvette , 32 ford or other vehicle.--all of which would run better and cleaner with a fresh mill under the metal.

The answer here is not capitulate and hide like rats , stalking someone at a 7-11 to buy things for you with their Nevada drivers licence, the answer is to unscrew the California governmental agency that did this.

If it is California EPA, god help them-- as they are criminally negligent elsewhere.

More News as it happens.

Steve
__________________
Steve SPF 2734 MK3 / Brock Coupe #54- panavia.com
Reply With Quote