Quote:
Originally Posted by blykins
One very important caveat.
Jeff's engine on another dyno would be closer to 680-690. Your engine on the dyno I use would most likely be closer to 560-570.
An engine dynod here gained 45 hp by running it across town to the nearest superflow....
That's why dyno numbers infuriate me.
|
Brent, you have no idea what dyno was used for my engine circa 2008 and any quotes of what Jeff's or my engine would do "here or there" is pure unadulterated Internet BS. You simply just don't know, and are speculating based upon nearly zero info. And frankly, I would be insulted if I actually cared what you thought about my engine in the least.
My point is simple. At some point the HP difference is superfluous. As I think the decision between solid and hydraulic.
For the record, my engine was dyno'ed in two separate locations with two different dynometers at two different points in time (1-year apart), but with nearly similar results.
Lastly, while I'm not engine builder and expert like you, I sincerely doubt Jeff's engine makes 130 HP more than mine and any claims of such are complete utter nonsense. But I totally understand your position of owning and operating an engine building business and the necessity to promote said business in order to be successful and make money.
