[blykins]

Holy cow.

If you would spend half as much time on reading my posts as you do trying to think up wordy responses, you would see that you have misquoted me....quite badly.

Nowhere did I say there was 130 hp difference.

What I *did* say, was that if these two engines were dyno'd on the same dyno, there would not just be 33 hp difference between them.

Again, let me reiterate: I did not say there were 130 hp difference.

Should I re-reiterate?

Let me state it a different way (or in the same way that I stated it the first time)....

If these engines were dyno'd on the same dyno, for instance, the one I use, you would most likely see that your engine would be around the 570-570 mark, where Jeff's was around 640.

Let's look at it from yet another view:

If these engines were dyno'd on the same dyno, for instance, the one you used, you would most likely see that your Jeff's would probably be around the 680-690 mark, compared to your 605.

I don't have a simple formula. I put them on the dyno, and whatever the dyno tells me, that's what I write down.

I'm still waiting to hear what your engine specs are, because the 482's that I've built with professionally CNC ported Edelbrock heads that flowed around 320-325, with a professionally ported Performer RPM intake, with around 10.5:1 compression, and a hydraulic roller cam with around 244-248 degrees at .050" and .630" lift didn't make 605 hp *on the dyno I use*.

You have convoluted this to the point where the simple point that was made at the beginning is far beyond simple now.

What was that point? Different brands of dynos yield different results and you can not make apples to apples comparisons of horsepower numbers.

You keep trying to make this a personal argument against me, my business ethics, my choice of advertising, etc., but all of that have nothing to do with anything.