View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2014, 08:37 AM
CobraEd's Avatar
CobraEd CobraEd is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA, VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blykins View Post
My point was Ed, that was too broad of a statement to make: "the small block will rev much quicker"...

Which FE's? Which small block? What does "rev" mean? Peak hp rpm? Sitting at idle and winging the throttle?

I will say that you are correct in that *some* FE's rotating assemblies are heavier, but not all. If you compare the bobweights between a 427W and a 428 FE, depending on what parts you use, the bobweights can be very similar.

I have also built many 4.250" stroke FE's that rev like chainsaws and pull past 7000 rpm.

It is certainly a case of physics, but you just can't make that broad of a statement, because it's not always true...thus being a lot of the issues about forum misconceptions.

BTW, thanks for the bump.
Brent Brent Brent . . . . bobweights have nothing to do with it. They just tune the balance. It also has nothing to do with how high the engine will rev. It has to do with how FAST the engine will get to 7,000 rpm. It is about the TOTAL mass difference of the crank and rods. And of course it is a very general statement and cannot be applied to specific engines. Not a determining factor in building/buying an engine but just a general difference that does exist as a minor factor. As a hypothetical example, if you had a 90lb wheel on a hand crank and a 9lb wheel on the same hand crank, which one would take you longer to spin to 7,000? Obviously the 90lb one. They could both reach the exact same rpm (7,000?) but the heavier one would take longer to get there.


.


.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________
Reply With Quote