[REAL 1]

Gentlemen: I am not trying nor is it my intention to belittle anyone's car with Websters. However, you can not have it both ways by taking what you like from one standard and applying a different standard to something else just to make you feel better and at the same time demean something else or debased it without being unfair and inconsistent. That's the point I am trying to make clear but many of you only hear what you want to hear and either don't get it or do and don't care.

Mdross1 obviously finds the use of Websters insulting to define your cars. I get it. Just as Continuation owners are insulted (and they are as I get PMs from many) when you demean what they own by saying they are "only replicas", "the only real ones were in the 60s" etc..

The way this hobby and car and industry around it have changed and evolved and the publics misuse of the Webster's definition has developed SAACs definitions and categories are fair, correct and well reasoned to comport with existing facts and circumstances. You can't take what you like from SAAC and toss the out as to others.

I have no problem applying Websters to the Contiuation Cobras. But we then apply it to your cars and that you won't like.

Btw this topic is related to the OP and slid into when does a car with a Cobra body stop being a replica of a Cobra.