Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimis
He wants an FE, whether he knows it or Not data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f579f/f579fbfd49f8e2fd247f77240b42ae651e0e050e" alt="EEK!"
A SCAT rotating assembly is a SCAT rotating assembly.
And humbly if I may, your maths on cubic inches is out data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/970e2/970e2bf4cdd9e7a973c9e34ba83373b4e8bf227f" alt="Wink"
445 vs 482 - I got me a mere 37 cubes. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fca44/fca44b0f36540c6ca34367a3bed5a31a4632e2d2" alt="Embarrassment"
|
I've actually lost track of what Detroit Bill is thinking about, but if it's the same FE stroke, probably those parts could be reused, but a Pond aluminum side-oiler block is different than a production 390 block.
To me, a 445 is a throwaway engine. I mean, really, why bother with that POS. I'd just get the Pond 482 to start.