View Single Post
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2015, 11:06 AM
Joe's Garage Joe's Garage is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 556
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twobjshelbys View Post
OK, well, I guess I'll call BS on this. Are you in possession of any facts from AC that state this? Else it's just speculation and "gee it would have been nice if it had turned out that way". But it didn't. "Just the facts, m'am" [which Jack Webb never said], and any sentence with the word "probably" in it is not a fact.
Part I
The 289 is all AC, the 427 was AC with some Ford input, it's all out there on the internet.

Production proved to be easy, since AC had already made most of the modifications needed for the small-block V8 when they installed the 2.6 L Ford Zephyr engine, including the extensive rework of the AC Ace's front end bodywork. The most important modification was the fitting of a stronger rear differential to handle the increased engine power. A Salisbury 4HU unit with inboard disc brakes to reduce unsprung weight was chosen instead of the old ENV unit. It was the same unit used on the Jaguar E-Type. On the production version, the inboard brakes were moved outboard to reduce cost. The only modification of the front end of the first Cobra from that of the AC Ace 2.6 was the steering box, which had to be moved outward to clear the wider V8 engine.

AC exported completed, painted and trimmed cars (less engine and gearbox) to Shelby who then finished the cars in his workshop in Los Angeles by installing the engine and gearbox and correcting any bodywork flaws caused by the car's passage by sea.

Last edited by Joe's Garage; 09-23-2015 at 11:59 AM..