Quote:
Originally Posted by REAL 1
Yes, you cite "Ned the Curator with an axe to grind" who is full of it on that statement. It's clear SAAC took the position they took years before any litigation they had with CS in 2008.
You cite "Ned".
I'll cite the World Registry.
 |
And now we're back to insulting Ned. He's got "an axe to grind" and he's "full of it"? That's a good strategy.
Here's what Ned said and I'll underline the important part just in case you miss it AGAIN.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedsel
One aspect of what was published in the 2008 SAAC registry that many people fail to consider is that SAAC was smack in the middle of a legal battle with Carroll Shelby when the registry was being written. Given the delicacy of the proceedings, great care was taken not to antagonize Shelby or his attorneys, and certain liberties were taken with respect to what might otherwise have been seen as calling a spade a spade. At the time, it was PC to call it a shovel instead.
|
So, as you can see, the Registry was written during the time when there were legal proceedings. At the same time, uh, 7-10 years ago. Is that understandable?
Now,
BACK TO THE FUTURE, Biff Tannen, it's 2015 and SAAC has removed any words like "genuine" or "authentic." Kaput! Kapesh?
If I have to explain this one more time...