Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamo
Ned, I couldn't have screwed up my typing worse than if I tried. Below is what my brain told my fingers to type...
Sounds to me like Ned was there to provide the information. I would hasten to say that it would not be in SAAC's best interest to get more involved unless requested by the authorities, and be engulfed in some immunity.
|
Seems to me SAAC is implicitly involved with the SAAC 3000 Registrar sounding the alarm of fraud on the supposed offering of this "CSX 3160" if in fact that what actually occurred during this supposed conversation with the "supposed" probate attorney and the supposed collector and not something else.
Ah, who cares I'm just misinterpreting again. Silly me.