Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz
The unfortunate thing with that, Joe, is unfortunately some folks also "know" the value of inaccurate historical information as well, so as the recognised go-to authority on these cars the SAAC Registry has to make sure all info to the greatest extent possible is vetted.
|
I was hoping that was not the case but certainly understand it. Maybe refine the process a little. Make Ned's work with the history fixed which has been vetted and accepted. What remains is upkeep on new owners and crashes going forward. So owner's would have read/write access to update from Ned's retirement date, they can't go back and tamper with Ned's earlier work. I'm trying to think of what an unscrupulous owner could come up with in the way of "current history" that would make his original worth more, nothing comes to mind. I already think you have built-in policing with the SAAC membership. You saw what happened here on just "semantics", and that was from the peanut gallery sitting in the cheap seats
