[cycleguy55]

Originally Posted by Tim7139

You want some facts? Read the major piece in Sat. WSJ that was co authored by a member of the IPCC. It covers a wealth of information on, for instance, the reliance on less than accurate modeling, how many embellish the most aggressive predictions rather than the most probable, the utter lack of accuracy on model based formulations, and the fact that AGAINST MANY IPCC SCIENTISTS, their recent publication was based more on politics not science.

The WSJ piece was actually opinion - and stated as such.

However, claims that the IPCC does not accurately represent the views and findings of the scientists, on whose work the IPCC reports are based, are not supported by the facts.

https://www.skepticalscience.com/Hul...-consensus.htm