Quote:
Originally Posted by joyridin'
No, he stated it was not one of the 60's versions and beyond that, he did not know.
So every replica at a car show with one of those fake tags you can buy with whatever number on it can now be misrepresented as a real 60's Cobra? What a joke! Heck, for all you know, somebody was attempting to make a very real looking reproduction. Something many on this site try to do all the time. I guess everybody that builds a replica now can be accused of potentially trying to commit fraud by your skewed viewpoint. Especially if they put one of those fake tags on their car!
|
First, Rick Muck (Mark IV) who sold AC MKIV's when they were new and I'd consider an expert on them said its repro plate on page 1. And the "666" is simple nonsense.
Second, if an owner installs an AC ID plate on a replica and stamps VIN #'s on hinges, shock towers, etc. and adds the repo ID plate, then that's taking it to a different level IMO. And yes I personally find it offensive and object to that.
Third, in this day and age, you can come across a vexatious litigant as a potential buyer and whether or not you have misrepresented the car, you could be sued anyway and that will cost you a lot of money in legal fees defending yourself. And then, the person may win the case. I've read about worse cases.