View Single Post
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2016, 08:25 PM
fordracing65's Avatar
fordracing65 fordracing65 is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tempe,AZ-High Point,NC, AZ
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham #684, 482FE, Mike Mccluskey build
Posts: 2,520
Send a message via Skype™ to fordracing65
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phx Mike View Post
Not sure why you would say it is technical ignorance. The aluminum block weighs about 60 lbs less than the iron block. That's not insignificant if you care about weight. And if you choose an iron block and aluminum heads you have to consider the thermal expansion differences and what issues that may or may not create. Going with the iron heads adds more weight.

I made a very conscientious decision to choose aluminum for the engine block in my car due to the resale value and because it is in keeping with the "technology" and low weight focus of the Kirkham product design (billet suspension components etc). I don't think that makes me a "fool" or a "bench racer".

There is no question that aluminum sand castings have more porosity issues than cast iron components - this is a problem in the aerospace parts world also and the associated casting yield gets built into the cost of the parts. There are ways to help mitigate it such as hipping, mold and core design, mold heat and pouring technique but none are foolproof nor inexpensive and certainly not approaches that are well suited to low volume production.

It will be interesting to see 3D printed parts when the additive manufacturing machines get large enough to make them.
Pond website. Iron fe block 285lbs. Aluminum fe block 135lbs. That's a 150lbs difference. You're about 90lbs off.
__________________
PRIDEnJOY
Reply With Quote