Hi all.
Just playing devil's advocate for a sec, I find it a little peculiar in that a review of this event, brought about by lower than ideal attendance, would find that nothing significant needs to change.
Seems you have run a circular arguement, and got a finding in reality that says, those who attended last time are likely to do so again. But, if the quest was for greater attendance, you surely cannot expect to do the same thing and get a different result.
Einstein had words to say about that.
Just a thought is all
