View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2019, 12:41 PM
kevins2's Avatar
kevins2 kevins2 is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Chester, PA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #795 427 S/C completed Jan. '14 - '68 FE 427 side oiler
Posts: 1,051
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twobjshelbys View Post
These "catch cans" are one of the biggest auto scams ever invented. You understand that the amounts being spoken of amount to "drops per 100 miles", are insignificant in any sense of the word and well within the capacity of the intake system to deal with it. If you are collecting MORE than that then you have a significant problem that needs to be addressed!!! Seriously, if it were a real problem don't you think the auto manufacturers would include them in the car?
Yes, the catch can is unnecessary. So is the Wagner adjustable PCV valve, no arguement. In fact, the entire car is unnecessary which is one of the things I love about it.

On a more serious note, since I decided to install the Wagner PCV valve and have unbaffled valve covers, I'll actually get some utility out of the catch can. I will be able to see if I've created a problem since this PCV valve is known to suck up oil without baffles. My first approach was to try baffled grommets but that's probably too easy. If I'm not happy with the amount of oil collected, I'll make baffles. Wagner did an oil consumption test with two different baffle designs and pretty much took the guesswork out of it.

http://mewagner.com/?p=1221

So, one unnecessary project may very well lead to another

Kevin
__________________
"Anyone who drives faster than you is a maniac and anyone who drives slower than you is an idiot" - George Carlin
Reply With Quote