View Single Post
  #117 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2020, 12:17 PM
Anthony Anthony is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: cleveland, OH
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX4000, 427
Posts: 1,999
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CompClassics View Post
“I think the contour of the cam, after the lobe, is different between solid and hydraulic cams.”

This was what my question was mostly regarding, would the less aggressive profile of the camshaft allow for longevity of the valve train?
It’s my understanding, that with solid lifter cams, after the value closes, the lobe decreases another .015”, whatever the lash is, and the lobe remains constant until the next time the valve opens, when the lobe ramps up again. This is in contrast to a hydraulic cam, where after the valve closes , the lobe ever slow gradually decreases in lift until the valve begins to open again. Which surprised me when I read in the engine masters challenge, i think the one engine was using solid lifters with a hydraulic cam.
__________________
"After jumping into an early lead, Miles pitted for no reason. He let the entire field go by before re-entering the race. The crowd was jumping up and down as he stunned the Chevrolet drivers by easily passing the entire field to finish second behind MacDonald's other team Cobra. The Corvette people were completely demoralized."
Reply With Quote