Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz
You obviously missed this in my post:
To reiterate in simpler terms - it definitely does not prove anything, but yes, as recounted it does in fact imply ownership.
|
No, I didn't miss it. I just don't put any credence in it. There's only ONE such statement. Unstbstantiated by any corroborating written evidence. This is hearsay at best.
In any case, lacking written documentation to the prove it, it's a nice story.
Not showing up a single time in any paper trail says something.
And even if by some miracle, a proven title shows up. 50+ years later, what will change?
There are lots of reporters that claim to have seen UFOs too.