Hi Brad:
I agree with 99% of what you are saying.
What I was referring to from Ron is:
" As a matter of fact I do actually know a man here that bought a Cobra in Oregon that was titled as a 1966 Ford something I think it was and he spent a year in a mess. I think some of it if not most was his fault but he got a letter from the CAL. DMV that they were going to investigate him for fraud. I talked to him last week and he now has it titled in Calif. and everything
is ok now but it was a real mess he said. As I said above I don't know all the details but he has a lot of money and I think used a good chunk to get the investigation stopped and everything straightened out. Understandably he doesn't like to talk about it. This is the only person that I know of for a fact that has had a problem and as I said above, I think part of it may have been caused by him." end quote.
Don't under estimate the DMV, if you are anyone else used a tittle washing company, in January reregister under the new law.
If anyone has correctly insured their car they will be covered by their insurance company.
That means the insurance company is aware they are covering a cobra replica and you sent
them pictures. Trust me, follow some of these threads and it's clear that many owners think
they have their butts covered because they got away with insuring the car as a mustang
or 66 2 door ford... we all have COBRA-REPLICAS-KIT CARS. That is why Randy and the others
who did things right were protected as well they should have been. I am saying be honest
with your insurance company because they will send out an investigator like Steve-Klayfish
who is nobody's fool.
Like I said I agree with you. I'll buy the first Raki!!
God Bless America,
daniel
