Thread: ERA vs SPF
View Single Post
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2003, 01:16 PM
REAL 1's Avatar
REAL 1 REAL 1 is offline
Banned
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Jersey, N.J
Cobra Make, Engine: Shelby Cobra CSX4206 aluminum body, original 1965 NASCAR 427 SO, Dual quads.
Posts: 3,897
Not Ranked     
Default

I'm not so sure the difference between a BB ERA and BB SPF will buy you a Featherlight trailer. They are fairly pricey.

I've seen used SPF's in the range of $47K to $55K. The difference in price for the ERA is insignificant considering the total expenditure.

As to the chasis both being square tube. So what? You can't tell they have square tube chasis by looking at the cars unless you look underneath or down in the engine compartment.

Aesthetically both in the finer details and demensions the ERA is spot on except for chasis and suspension which is not immediately visable.

While the SPF appears correct in all its dimensions to the casual observer or John Q Public, for those that have a more "expert" eye they are clearly off dimensionally in several areas. To people who know what they are looking at like us Cobra nuts the ERA is more aesthetically accurate in all its dimensions. No question.

The only downside to the ERA is the wait for a new car. SPF is clearly better for those that don't want to wait.

In the end both are very nice cars and I would happily own either.
__________________
U.S. Army Rangers. Leading travel agents to Allah.

Last edited by REAL 1; 01-29-2003 at 01:21 PM..
Reply With Quote