[Super-Snake]

First off I would like to make it clear that I speak on behalf of myself. The members here know exactly who I am and I have nothing to hide. I am not an employee of SPF and am not authorized to speak on their behalf.

In your longwinded and unorganized response you have continued to make multiple assumptions in order to create some semblance of an argument. Unfortunately many of your assumptions are false.

You have assumed that every company including SPF told CS to f'off without any discussions and as a result should be treated as such. You have assumed that a company that gets sued and settles before trial is guilty. You have assumed that SPF claimed to make Cobras. You have assumed that the FORD/SAI/SPF trial is over. You have assumed that Barrett Jackson is a fair indicator of car values. You have assumed that Steve and I have not had private discussions about the value of his old car. You have assumed that I have no knowledge or experience dealing with SAI or SAI products. You have assumed that I make a living selling SPF cars. You have assumed that no one has ever sold an SPF for more than they paid for it nor sold one for more than one would cost new. You have assumed that I can't afford an SAI car and as a result am jealous of yours.

What is it that they say about assumptions??…

Your comments in this forum continue to be the most odious pieces of effluvium. To call them mere speculation devoid of any foundation or technical merit is an understatement of titanic proportion.

Steve and I both agreed that his car sold at a minimum 25% premium.

In approximately 8 years there are over 1600 people that disagree with your humble opinion on the engineering, components, build quality/fit and finish, retail price and resale value of the SPF product and have purchased one.

I will also not venture to guess the number of people that have not purchased one that disagree with your humble opinion.