[Super-Snake]

Once again, in the fashion of your hood rivets you have ignored the finer details.

It’s obvious that I will not share most of my experiences on this forum. You wouldn’t believe me, it would be a waste of my time, and accomplish nothing. I will on the other hand continue to enjoy poking holes in your arguments and occasionally ruffle your “feathers”.

First thing, please post the entire text of the SPF add that you describe. Additionally advise the copyright date.

Second, I decisively used the term “minimum” to describe the greater than 25% overpayment in the purchase price of Steve’s car. I agreed to increase the number slightly from 75k in consideration of the items in the car that could be sold separately at greater profit.

In the beginning of this thread a different clubcobra member used the word “pigeon” to describe a buyer that pays an exorbitant upcharge in the purchase of a car. I agreed to the use of that word in this scenario. I did not call all CSX owners pigeons and would not do that today.

If you would like to refer to yourself as a pigeon I have no problem with that. In fact over the past three years I have seen you called many other names. In many cases those names were much worse. If you were to twist my arm behind my back and force me to choose one against my will as my favorite I would select “WEENIE”.

Most SPF’s sell all brand new in the low 50’s when professionally completed with 351w’s. I am against the use of 460’s or sideoilers. Stroker motors are approximately $1500 additional. I used the number 1600 because that is fact. I am definitely biased and do feel that the SPF is the best product for the design and the money. Have I stated that before? No.