Thread: FE 2X4 Opinions
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2003, 11:12 AM
Sizzler Sizzler is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago, Oscar winner, my kind of town,
Posts: 614
Not Ranked     
Default

I love my 2x4 setup.
No power valves worries.
Set the AFR table to 14.64 for idle and 13 or so at 96ka and above, and ready to go. 18+ mpg with 2x4 "427" FE.
Join the rest of us in the 21st century and quit living in the past.

Nothing beats the look of 2x4's and being realistic, what's the point otherwise nowadays?

I do think that progressive linkage and possibly smaller cfm might be called for though I don't remember your exact engine parameters. I have 2 "600" cfm's with .607 lift cam and progressive linkage. Works great.

I would vote for "look good" instead of quibingly(sp) about absolute performance and nonsense like that there.
Reply With Quote