View Single Post
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2003, 06:18 AM
mrmustang's Avatar
mrmustang mrmustang is offline
CC Member/Contributor
Visit my Photo Gallery
Gold Star Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville, SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,740
Not Ranked     
Cool

Yes, you got it.....for example, my original 1968 GT350 convertible came originally from Ford with the following VIN

8T03J183030

Of course since it was to be made in to a Shelby convertible, it left the A.O. Smith plant with the following VIN and new MSO

8T03J183030-2623

The "2623" being the official Shelby addition to the serial number., thus requiring the new MSO. Since these new continuation cars are being done in a similar fashion, they too will require a new MSO or title stating their full VIN.....Since Shelby is still listed as a licensed vehicle manufacturer in the US, he can issue the new MSO as he sees fit.

Hope this helps to clear thise item up.



Bill S.




Quote:
Originally posted by Excaliber


I think I get it. They HAD to issue an MSO because of the Shelby number added to the VIN number. I would guess thats a totally legal move and essentially creates a "new" car. Not being DOT and Fed approved could be a problem for some. But maybe they aint really driving them anyway?

,,,like I said before, I'm sure there are plenty of folks scratching their heads over US trying to figure out WHY we would pay so much a 2 seater car with no top!

Ernie
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.

First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS