[computerworks]

Hi Evan.... I disagree.

1. The car is frickin' ugly, but that's subjective, I will state that I have good taste and know ugly when I see it.

2. Collector cars merely have a value equal to what someone is willing to pay... no buyers, no worth. The recent high-priced auction sale may have been a little insider-trading, so to speak.

3. These cars simply have no place in the registry and SAAC should change their minds. The cars are neither built nor sold by any legal entity connected with Shelby or Shelby Automobiles. If they put this mutt in the next book, they should also have sections for Motorcycles, Guitars and Caramel Corn.

...and neither should Sanderson's next-year product, which has been leaked as a 1965-66 GT-350.

I do agree that bashing the endorsement is naive and wrong... it's strictly business and there's nothing wrong with that.