[Randy Rosenberg]

Curtis is correct. "Re-titling" is one of the main reasons why the 500 sequence numbers were completely allocated by June 12th this year, as compared to the fact that last year, by Dec 31, there were still SB100 sequence numbers unclaimed.

Having original documents *might* have saved this California owner from loosing (being forced to sell) his SPF.

Does this all make sense now? It is a real tragedy, since the original owner did absolutely nothing wrong, paid every penny that was asked of him, yet in the end, got screwed by the system.

This is why I got so pissed off ealier in this thread. People were jumping to conclusions without the facts.