View Single Post
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2005, 06:56 PM
RichMusson RichMusson is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Cobra Make, Engine: FFR - Blue W/ Silver Stripe
Posts: 520
Not Ranked     
Default

Okay guys,
I have been reading this threat & referring to my sous(e) si(d) spell checker as well as my sous(e) si(d) grammar checker. Y’all are missing one very important part of sous(e)si(d) grammar. ALL sentences must end in a preparation. There are NO exceptions to this rule.

So, for instance, if the statement happened to be, “I am gunna go to da sous(e) si(d) for a snake & eggs’. The proper response would be “I wanna go WITH”. You see, it requires a needless and confusing preparation on the end on the sentence.

Now, some of you, with the older grammar checker might say – yea but, ‘I wanna go to’ is also acceptable. However, that now is considered improper since it might get confused with the Nortd side grammar checker with would allow, ‘I tink i’m gunna go too’.

Do y’all see the difference?
Reply With Quote