[cdnus]

ERA626
You aren,t the one who seems to be at fault here according to Pro's beligerant response
You clearly stated you spoke to them 1 year ago in your original post, but it seems some people can't read & comprehend black & white.
Their statement,
"Just so we have the facts straight, Mr. James explained that a communication from February of 2005 was thought by you to have occurred in January of 2006. I understand Mr. James attempted to correct you but you were adamant about the e mail information and approximate time frame."
is clearly Butt covering by someone.
Who's confused here?
Can people not see through this smokescreen.

Craig