Mike:
1.Said my rear tail lights and front parking lights had to say "DOT" or "SAE" on them. Should I fight this because in the R-157 it does say that only the 2 front headlamps need to say that? I don't even know if I can get those other lenses to say that.
**** When I had some questionable items when registering the Cobra, the DMV inspector mentioned R-157 is only a guideline, not 100% complete. Might want to check with aftermarket Cobra suppliers such as Finish Line regarding the tail/parking lights.
http://www.cobraaccessories.com/cata...t.php?cPath=50
Chances of getting the DMV to change their mind, sorry to say, extremely low to no probability., it is both their football and field. Might also want to contact ERA in New Britain or Jay @ Vintage Motorsports, in case their lenses would fit. Have you contacted SPF to see if their current lenses meet the DOT labeling requirement ?
Did you show the DMV inspector the R-157 regulation, in a lowkey manner pleading for understanding without challenging ?
http://www.vintage-motorsports.com/
2. Noise. Now they said the car read a 75db. Damn close. Any advise on this would be appreciated.
**** There are a number of postings regarding meeting the dB requirement, might want to try the search feature regarding side pipes, exhaust noise, etc. etc Some have mentioned drilling a small hole in the exhaust outlet and inserting a trap, steel wool tied together, tempoarily held by a rod and bolt
3. This one hurts. Said that the edge of the side pipe(s) did not pass beyond the edge of the doors. Top edge no, but bottom edge yes. Anyone got a long set of SPF sidepipes?
** Had not seen any past references to this ruling. Wonder how other SPFs in CT passed, might want to open a new Thread regarding the specific topic
I do not recall if the reasons for failing are recorded on the form, a long shot, another visit might get another inspector with a different interpretation of the regulations since it would appear there are judgement calls. Sorry I could not be of more help.