Jamo...with respect, I've got to agree with boxhead.
Firstly, let me say I'm don't appreciate the naming of any supplier when a club member has a dispute with that supplier.
However, I make comment on the consistency of the action and this I feel is the point boxhead questions.
A recent thread in Transmission talk really got stuck into a supplier to the extent that some of the posts turned on the member who posted and he had to admit he had handled the truth rather carelessly.
Tko600 Warning!!!!
In the end the thread was not pulled, still exists in Transmission Talk and has spawned other threads. As it has turned out the problem ( If there really is one) appears to be in the manufacture of the gearbox and not with the supplier.
Yet the supplier WAS named and I'm sure they found the whole situation embarrassing as they were forced to defend themselves.
I'm not criticizing the policy....just the consistent policing of that policy.