Not Ranked
My earlier post was alluding to the constitutional clause that Bill posted. While many of the posts mention 1965 Ford or 1965 Cobra on the title, I specificly mentioned a 1965 Superformance Cobra Coupe label. It is known that Superformance was not in business in 1965, and as long as California transferred it in as it is listed on the original title, no one could misconstrue it as a Shelby/AC/Ford. So a point of resale should not be an issue. However, the Constitution takes presidence over any state law ( see:Civil War for further reading), and California is thumbing their nose at it. I am not referring to those that are illegitimately titled and registered. But the premise that other states titling process is so fraught with fraud that unless they adopt California's policies, any title coming from them will be scrutinized and put through special hoops. I am old enough to recall when cars in Ca. came without heaters as standard equipment. I don't recall that the other states adopting the policy of making heaters optional. I believe that it was required that cars in Ca. had to have heaters. Just as they were made to follow along with the rest of the country then, they should be compelled to under the Constitution now, or all states will begin to operate as independant countries and we will be making treaties within the U.S.
__________________
WDZ
|