Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MaSnaka
Sooooo...No SB100 required on those now legal 1965 CA titles?
|
Again this is a DMV issue. For what it is worth I still recommend full disclosure and to make sure the vehicle was correctly registered in the "65 titling state."
In the Title Unlimited case, everyone lied about what the vehicle was, including in the original out-of-state registration. The key to this exception (if it exists) is that the true nature of the vehicle must be disclosed at the time of the original out-of-state registration and all the requirements for registration must be met. Usually requirement may include that the vehicle be physically present in the jurisdiction and that the registered owner be a resident of the state. If that state chooses to title it under their law as a 1965 then California has to deal with it under our statutes
Note that that there is a fraud exception to the “full faith” provision that allows DMV to reject title. So if you lie in the original title state, the title will not be valid here.
This is a hot button issue and I am sure that clarification, one way or the other will be forthcoming.