[amy B]

Originally Posted by pipehunter

I think it is interesting that so many posts offer legal conclusions based on little more than the Nov 14 in terms of documentation. Second, that said, the reference in that letter to two sentences in the Registry to buttress the demands in the letter is certainly curious. Third, I find the SAAC letter and particularly the Burke quote to be amateurish, but then again, I had the same reaction to the Nov. 14 letter. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds and I cannot wait to see the agreement between Shelby and SAAC.

Finally, Amy B I respect your willingness to step up and field the questions. On the other hand, in light of the letter of Nov. 14, I certainly question your first comment (Nov.1, I believe) in this thread which reads, in pertinent part:

"The SAAC team will still continue with what they do, we hhave not renewed the shelby License, but I am sure they will continue with the registry. We at Shelby will also keep the registry for all new cars and old, if the owners of cobra and vintage mustang want to join.

I did not ask for there info back or any of their stuff. We have always maintained that we would keep the new cars we build and ford builds, SAAC does not have the GT_H or the shelby GT info, that has always been ours, as with all cars going forward."

Pipe, my comment was to the original post. I personally never asked for anything back, all I knew was that the license was not renewed. Bob said "I" asked, and it wasn't me. I am SAI, CSL cancelled the the license on Carroll's say. As I said I was always starting the new club and registry, the saac registrar are a great group, they will continue the work as they did before the license, I am sure.

Amy