I don't get this thing about 'unknowns'...
Shelby has applied to (hostile) take over the SAAC name, to own it. They did so before contacting SAAC about a license renewal issue. Did the USA need to wait for an 'official announcement' concerning Pearl Harbour, or was the act itself sufficient to put 2+2 together?
We have seen the 'official' letter for Shelbys attorney demanding return of certain paperwork. No cause for alarm, it's just a letter, everyone go back to sleep and wait for further 'official' instructions.
There is sufficient evidence to conclude at this point Shelby wants to crush SAAC, period.
Amy B. is discovering these 'facts' along with us. She has NOT been 'in the loop' as to what Shelby lawyers are up to, bless her heart, thats a good thing for her. But it speaks volumes as to the methods Shelby is willing to use to 'push the attack' on SAAC. Wake up and smell the coffee, there is a war going on here! What are the chances you can fully believe a statement issued by the Shelby
PR platoon? You would be a fool to take it at face value.
As Amy has stated, SHE, personally, did not ask SAAC for paperwork. What she didn't know was that Shelbys lawyers WERE doing that even as she typed her statement (or before).