Trev...nobody asked him to leave, or to even stop posting. I responded to him as a member.
I'm not sure whether I'll back either organization's play in this pissing match...I would rather be out driving. But when somebody starts pontificating about how letters are written and what tactics ought to be used, do they think they are immune from a critical response? Doesn't mean he has to whine
when somebody calls him at the table.
How can I ignore utter crap like this?
"Obviously, our superM does not believe that 12 honest men right and true could judge anyone's guilt or honesty..."
Jurys
wait until they hear
all the evidence...exactly the point he refuses to accept.
Look at all the stuff coming out daily in this little mess. One might have seen SAAC's quote in a different light had they waited a few days and seen what was going on at the patent/trademark office...might seem like barbarians are indeed at the gate. Course, one also has to wonder WTF brought them there. Who knows what else is out there...we're getting fed info in little bits and pieces.
Anyway, as others have suggested....blah blah blah All I see are two clutches of fancy-assed folks who look (and have acted) like they belong in the Sun King's Court fighting for the favor of the people they have long not really given a damn about other than to be heaped praise from when they fart.
Given some time, maybe some heads will roll.
{FTF}
