Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock
In a nutshell, what is SAAC's argument for fraud as it pertains to obtaining the license agreement?
|
Basically, from the filing, SAAC feels that C$ enjoined them to sign the agreement as a formality 'jus' ta keep my lawyers happy' and that the enforcement of the contract was to be superceded by the gentlemens agreement that had been in place for 30 years. This is lent credence by the fact that C$ did not seek the $1 per annum fee or financial statements in a timely manner.