Not Ranked
Dan, we probably should not refer to 3303 as an "air-car" unless it can be shown that the claimed paperwork, i.e. a title or bill of sale, establishing a link between the original 3303 and the new one, did not actually accompany the transfer of the supposed rights to the car. If the legal right to the VIN was acquired and transferred, then the resulting car may be rightfully termed a clone, but it would not be an "air-car." We generally reserve that term for cars which have been built from thin air by someone with no proper claim whatsoever to the VIN.
__________________
Ned Scudder
|