View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:34 AM
patrickt's Avatar
patrickt patrickt is offline
Half-Ass Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,011
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmustang View Post
The Supreme court of Illinois also ruled in a class action lawsuit that insurance companies cannot be held liable for diminished value claims.
As a point of clarification, cases such as these (and the Texas Supreme Court ruled in a similar fashion) only deal with an insurer's duty to pay under the terms of the insurance policy. They are not applicable to negligence claims against someone who has damaged your property (tort law and damage theory apply against the tort feasor here). There is a split of opinion in the states on whether you may be compensated for the diminution in value of property in addition to the cost of repairs (just in case someone has a son or daughter struggling to come up with a law review topic).
Reply With Quote